I have completed a batch using acetone and while it could just be an unusual batch I am very impressed.Today25L meth. 800 NaOH1.5L acetoneFallout 1.55L meth 130g NaOHGood passGlyc 25L bio 160L meth reclaimed 8L just from bio.So 10+ L less glyc 15+L more bio. Next time I will cut the chemicals down more and then start adjusting the times. Very impressed so far.The glyc has not set yet and I suspect that there is meth in it. Next time I will WBD.Dick
Correct me if I'm wrong, but surely the increase of bio is due to the meths stying in the bio not the gly.This could be checked by demething both bio and gly, them measuring the bio, gly and the, well lets refer to it as condensate as we don't know the concentration of meths to acetone.
Yes I think you are right mark If this is the case then if we can get the meth down to 13ish% then the condensate should be mostly acetone hopefully. I think there's lots of work till we get it perfected but just knowing that a small amount makes a good difference means that most test done using acetone should be beneficial. Going on results so far i think we can say that we can reduce the quantity that's reported in the research paper.