Author Topic: The lazyman process  (Read 20515 times)

Offline K.H

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2353
  • Location: Tosser towers
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #30 on: October 09, 2012, 10:48:35 AM »
Sodium methylate might be worth trying with this process with it's higher yields and no water?

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5108
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #31 on: October 09, 2012, 10:50:57 AM »
I was just thinking that.  Presumably with less water there would be less soap/yield loss.

Offline Julian

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 6389
    • Used Cooking Oil Collection website
  • Location: East Surrey, UK.
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #32 on: October 09, 2012, 12:20:30 PM »
Liking the sound of this process, sounds ideal for Muppets like me.

Be interesting to try a "Carrington wash", comparing the amount of acid needed, compaired with a normal batch.  Would that give an indication as to where the additional catalyst ends up?

Is the excess of catalyst likely to have an effect on the performance of Glogs?
Used Cooking Oil Collection website ... http://www.surreyusedcookingoilcollection.palmergroup.co.uk

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5108
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #33 on: October 09, 2012, 12:51:24 PM »
I've just realised that an extra 200g over the 800g I would usually use is actually 25% extra not 20% extra (though is is 20% of the final amount) so I've gone back and edited my previous posts to reflect this.

Offline therecklessengineer

  • Administrator
  • Oil obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #34 on: October 09, 2012, 07:56:13 PM »
Thought I'd chime in here.

Very similar to what I've been doing, except I don't even bother to titrate any more. I know my titration normally comes out at about 7g/litre, so I normally increase that to about 8g/litre, and just shove it in.

Very rarely get a fail, in which case I drop the glyc and do a 2 stage.

Given your findings Tony, I might increase that to 8.5g/litre.

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5108
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #35 on: October 09, 2012, 07:57:41 PM »
5 days of settling, Glyc is solid, 50:50 soap test is getting well towards being clear!

Having poured the floating bio from my hastily drained Glyc into the settle drum, the yield looks OK  too.

Edit: just got in a post before me James, good to hear it!  To think I used to be paranoid about going 0.1 over on titrations.

I take it you don't water prewash either?
« Last Edit: October 09, 2012, 10:19:06 PM by Tony »

Offline K.H

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2353
  • Location: Tosser towers
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #36 on: October 09, 2012, 08:05:09 PM »
This must be at the opposite end of the spectrum from the 2 stage non titration
« Last Edit: October 24, 2012, 10:27:03 PM by K.H »

Offline Keef

  • Administrator
  • Oil obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 552
    • Adur Cooking Oils
  • Location: Sussex
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #37 on: October 09, 2012, 08:35:31 PM »
Looks like titration is well out of vogue these days.

It'll be back, just like cheesecloth shirts and monkey boots.  8)

Offline Glycer-rides

  • Wiki Editor
  • Valve head
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
  • Location: North East London
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #38 on: October 10, 2012, 12:47:11 PM »
The Lazy bug is catching...I'm done with 2am finishes (and not even finished)

With a 'suitable' heated / pumped wvo settle tank, at the end of the WBD, one could immediately use the hot glyc. to dewater the next load of wvo (already heated to 40 C). Maybe pump it about overnight. CH pumps will do the job and have such a small power consumption.

Just avoid any runs of pipe that solid glyc would block when cooled some time later. That would save some heating ... but, would it be as good as 105 C boiling off?
No use for really wet oil as the glyc from a same sized batch isn't enough but for good clear, low tit wvo, 20% glyc could be enough.

What does the panel think?
Brewing bio. And still not breaking cars!

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5108
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #39 on: October 10, 2012, 01:14:33 PM »
A very good question.  I guess any WBD process allows for the Glyc to be used straight after for drying, but how well it dries, I don't know.  I think that would require experimenting using Keith's water test kit.

However, if you have damp oil I would imagine that Glyc only has a certain capacity for water extraction, so you couldn't be sure the oil was dry without testing.  At least with heating over 105C you can be pretty sure there is minimal water left.

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5108
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #40 on: October 14, 2012, 06:25:16 PM »
Tested the bio for soap today and got a lovely clear 50:50 :)  Will be doing another batch this way as soon as I've dewatered some more oil.

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5108
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #41 on: October 24, 2012, 11:18:34 AM »
Did another batch this way no problem.  Nice clear 3/27 pass again after single staging.  It's settling now.  So easy, no titration and no faffing with two stage glyc.

Offline Carrington

  • Wiki Editor
  • Valve head
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
  • There all good days just some better than others
    • Carrington fuels .co.uk
  • Location: Wellingborough
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #42 on: October 24, 2012, 08:53:28 PM »
You'll all miss titrating  when it's gone
I on the other hand have to titrate 5x per batch so I'll always be happy in the knolage that I'm not in the in crowd

Paul
www. Carringtonfuels.co.uk

Offline Head Womble

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2082
  • I like shiny things
  • Location: Heathrow area
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #43 on: October 24, 2012, 10:02:24 PM »

With a 'suitable' heated / pumped wvo settle tank, at the end of the WBD, one could immediately use the hot glyc. to dewater the next load of wvo (already heated to 40 C). Maybe pump it about overnight. CH pumps will do the job and have such a small power consumption.

Just avoid any runs of pipe that solid glyc would block when cooled some time later. That would save some heating ...

What does the panel think?

If you ran a reversed flow system (pumped from the top to the bottom) and had the outlet central in the drum and just above the settled gly level you wouldn't suffer from blocked pipes, just a big lump in the bottom if the pump stopped overnight.
Skoda Yeti L&K 2L TDI 150 CR DPF Adblue, running pimp diesel.
VW Golf SV 1.4 TSI DSG.

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5108
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: The lazyman process
« Reply #44 on: April 29, 2013, 05:06:01 PM »
Well I've been doing this for months now, overdosing the catalyst.  Not had a bad batch yet!  Yield does not seem to be noticeably less, though my processing time is as I'm getting a clear pass with a single stage.