Author Topic: New processor.  (Read 7205 times)

Offline Oilybloke

  • Wiki Editor
  • Impeller jammer
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
  • Location: Jersey C.I.
New processor.
« on: January 23, 2013, 06:09:28 PM »
I am building a new processor from a 300ltr s/steel tank (domed top & bottom). I have 120 lpm pump, venturi, eductor & quad core condensor, all to fit 28mm pipework. Can anyone steer me towards some alternative diagrams (I have checked the wiki here) to help with the pipework layout?

I am particularly confused with the eductor placing. If I am two staging, is it placed for optimum performance from the first stage, or second?

Cheers guys!

Offline Julian

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 6389
    • Used Cooking Oil Collection website
  • Location: East Surrey, UK.
Re: New processor.
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2013, 06:26:01 PM »
I think that's one of the biggest problems with eductors, you're limited to a certain capacity in the processor if they are to work correctly and the main reason why I've not installed one.

I guess the best position would be to suit the first stage as the second stage reaction is usually quite quick.

As an alternative you could try making an adjustable one ... use a couple of "O" rings in place of an olive in a compression fitting and mount it vertically through the top of the processor.  You'd need a suitably rated flexible hose to accommodate the movement.  I've used this idea to adjust the height of my "never overflowing" wash tank with good effect.

As you go through the build would you mind taking loads of photos?  It would be nice to have a wiki page documenting a complete processor build.



Used Cooking Oil Collection website ... http://www.surreyusedcookingoilcollection.palmergroup.co.uk

Offline Carrington

  • Wiki Editor
  • Valve head
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
  • There all good days just some better than others
    • Carrington fuels .co.uk
  • Location: Wellingborough
Re: New processor.
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2013, 06:38:53 PM »
Just a thought
If your starting from scratch is it possible to install a mixing whisk.
I would never go back to pump mixing even if I had to do it on a small scale.

www. Carringtonfuels.co.uk

Offline photoman290

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 803
  • Location: west cornwall
Re: New processor.
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2013, 06:45:54 PM »
I am building a new processor from a 300ltr s/steel tank (domed top & bottom). I have 120 lpm pump, venturi, eductor & quad core condensor, all to fit 28mm pipework. Can anyone steer me towards some alternative diagrams (I have checked the wiki here) to help with the pipework layout?

I am particularly confused with the eductor placing. If I am two staging, is it placed for optimum performance from the first stage, or second?

Cheers guys!

check with jamesrl but i am sure he said as long as you have enough mix to meet the minimum 3 inches from the nozzle that is the most important measurement and if it is higher it is ok, but you don't want it any lower than that.

Offline nigelb

  • Wiki Editor
  • Grand Gunge Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1429
  • Location: Leicester
Re: New processor.
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2013, 07:14:14 PM »
Just a thought
If your starting from scratch is it possible to install a mixing whisk.
I would never go back to pump mixing even if I had to do it on a small scale.

How would you describe your whisk Paul?

I had a little play with a slow revolving paddle a few years back. I managed to liberate a redundant motor and made a paddle from nylon complete with different sized holes drilled into it. It worked quite well but it did not have the advantages of a pump.

Nige

Offline Oilybloke

  • Wiki Editor
  • Impeller jammer
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
  • Location: Jersey C.I.
Re: New processor.
« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2013, 07:16:39 PM »
I think that's one of the biggest problems with eductors, you're limited to a certain capacity in the processor if they are to work correctly and the main reason why I've not installed one.

I guess the best position would be to suit the first stage as the second stage reaction is usually quite quick.

As an alternative you could try making an adjustable one ... use a couple of "O" rings in place of an olive in a compression fitting and mount it vertically through the top of the processor.  You'd need a suitably rated flexible hose to accommodate the movement.  I've used this idea to adjust the height of my "never overflowing" wash tank with good effect.

As you go through the build would you mind taking loads of photos?  It would be nice to have a wiki page documenting a complete processor build.
Thank you Julian, and yes, I have thought about an adjustable height for the eductor. I am happy to take pictures of the build, but am too much of a luddite to get them posted here! If somebody can help, I am happy to mail them!
« Last Edit: January 23, 2013, 08:29:17 PM by Oilybloke »

Offline Oilybloke

  • Wiki Editor
  • Impeller jammer
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
  • Location: Jersey C.I.
Re: New processor.
« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2013, 07:19:54 PM »
Just a thought
If your starting from scratch is it possible to install a mixing whisk.
I would never go back to pump mixing even if I had to do it on a small scale.

How would you describe your whisk Paul?

I had a little play with a slow revolving paddle a few years back. I managed to liberate a redundant motor and made a paddle from nylon complete with different sized holes drilled into it. It worked quite well but it did not have the advantages of a pump.

Nige
I have used a processor with a paddle, and don't think it matches an eductor for efficiency. I am also thinking along the lines of static mixers perhaps. I know of one system that uses a Saniflow toilet macerator as a mixer!

Offline nigelb

  • Wiki Editor
  • Grand Gunge Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1429
  • Location: Leicester
Re: New processor.
« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2013, 07:55:02 PM »
Well there's something I've never heard of being used before...a saniflow macerator. Have you seen it in use?

Offline Carrington

  • Wiki Editor
  • Valve head
  • ****
  • Posts: 257
  • There all good days just some better than others
    • Carrington fuels .co.uk
  • Location: Wellingborough
Re: New processor.
« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2013, 08:21:44 PM »
When I was using standered wvo I could process 3000L of oil using ASM in 45 mins to a complete conversion . I think it's down to matching the paddle to the tank plus I have FPHE inside the tank to help with turbulence.
Not sure of the pump I'd need for similar success.
My paddle is only about 9inch 3blade 1/3 from the bottom
www. Carringtonfuels.co.uk

Offline K.H

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2353
  • Location: Tosser towers
Re: New processor.
« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2013, 08:26:57 PM »
Three inches from the surface to the top of the eductor and set it up for the first stage.

Offline Julian

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 6389
    • Used Cooking Oil Collection website
  • Location: East Surrey, UK.
Re: New processor.
« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2013, 08:43:48 PM »
Interesting that alternative mixing methods should come up.  I've done several Dr Peppers today and was surprised at how just a little vigorous shaking could get a decent looking reaction.

And Macerators ... years ago I worked for a company who experimented with fuel emulsification.  To mix heated, heavy marine diesel and water, they developed a thing that looked like a pump with a peripheral turbine pump impeller, but it had no pumping action.  It relied on fuel flow for throughput.  The serrated edge of the "impeller" with a very tight tolerance to the body, was supposed to create cavitation and emulsify the fuel.  I've always wondered how the idea would perform if making bio.
Used Cooking Oil Collection website ... http://www.surreyusedcookingoilcollection.palmergroup.co.uk

Offline Glycer-rides

  • Wiki Editor
  • Valve head
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
  • Location: North East London
Re: New processor.
« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2013, 11:49:48 PM »
Well there's something I've never heard of being used before...a saniflow macerator. Have you seen it in use?

Wouldn't that make sh!t bio, though?  :-X
Brewing bio. And still not breaking cars!

Offline Oilybloke

  • Wiki Editor
  • Impeller jammer
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
  • Location: Jersey C.I.
Re: New processor.
« Reply #12 on: January 31, 2013, 06:27:06 PM »
So, I'll be using this design......http://www.biopowered.co.uk/wiki/Processor_-_with_Methanol_condenser_(GL_design), but I have a couple of questions.

Regarding the venturi: my existing one is at right angles to the main flow (so only air or meth-oxide ever flows through it) and this seems to make more sense to me, inasmuch as it does not restrict any flow of oil into the tank. Am I right?

There is a vent from the glyc collection vessel, how necessary is this?

All comments appreciated,
Nick.

Offline db

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil stirrer
  • **
  • Posts: 59
  • Location: LEEDS
Re: New processor.
« Reply #13 on: January 31, 2013, 07:05:31 PM »
Well there's something I've never heard of being used before...a saniflow macerator. Have you seen it in use?

What about building an 'all in one bog/processor'?

No need to leave the garage for a dump then!! ;D

Offline Jamesrl

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2163
  • Location: Witsend, Cockoo Land
Re: New processor.
« Reply #14 on: January 31, 2013, 08:16:18 PM »
Regarding the venturi: my existing one is at right angles to the main flow (so only air or meth-oxide ever flows through it) and this seems to make more sense to me, inasmuch as it does not restrict any flow of oil into the tank. Am I right?

There is a vent from the glyc collection vessel, how necessary is this?

All comments appreciated,
Nick.

A well matched venturi has very little effect on pump flow, no more than 2 - 5%. As the venturi is only used to inject the methanol and demeth when an eductor is employed why worry about the flow.

Venting the Glyc vessel is down to the users discretion, do you WBD, how well vented is the work area? to be safe a vent is advisable, seal the whole thing.