Author Topic: No Titration reaction process  (Read 5282 times)

Offline Bio-boy

  • Impeller jammer
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • Location: Wirral
No Titration reaction process
« on: April 17, 2015, 11:01:21 AM »
How good is this process???

Is it comparable to a 2 stage titrated process???


Offline therecklessengineer

  • Administrator
  • Oil obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #1 on: April 17, 2015, 11:07:36 AM »
I can't remember the last time I titrated.

The titration is largely irrelevant. Once you throw in some catalyst and methanol it'll neutralise all the FFAs and partially convert. It's then just a 3/27 test to determine how much further it needs to go.

Truth be told - I didn't even bother pushing it to completion a lot of the time. The van and the landy are both pretty tolerant. I just ensured that the dropout was less than 0.5ml in 3 which is >80% conversion.

Offline Bio-boy

  • Impeller jammer
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • Location: Wirral
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #2 on: April 17, 2015, 11:13:28 AM »
Sounds like the way forward.

What quantities of KOH do you use for the 1st stage?

Offline Julian

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 6378
    • Used Cooking Oil Collection website
  • Location: East Surrey, UK.
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #3 on: April 17, 2015, 11:33:13 AM »
Hi Bio-boy, welcome to the forum and wiki.

Just to give you an alternative view, I've been making bio for 7 years and need to produce reasonable quality bio as some finds it's way into a VW PD engine, and when that won't go, boy, do I get it in the neck!

I've tried most of the methods suggested over the years, and when not using ASM I stick to a simple two stage with titration. 

I struggle to see why people are so anti titration. It really doesn't take long and you know exactly the quality of the oil you're dealing with.  I find it far less hassle than the no titration method ... having to mix a second batch of methoxide etc, added to which the method has a flaw ... the 3/27 test doesn't give instant results.  It can take several hours for all the fallout to occur.

 
Used Cooking Oil Collection website ... http://www.surreyusedcookingoilcollection.palmergroup.co.uk

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5104
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #4 on: April 17, 2015, 12:32:20 PM »
Welcome.

I've also not titrated for a long time and follow the two stage process to get a clear pass.  Nothing wrong with titrating, just that I'm lazy, it's easy and it works.

Offline dgs

  • Wiki Editor
  • Grand Gunge Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1308
  • Location: york
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #5 on: April 17, 2015, 01:49:19 PM »
How good is this process???

Is it comparable to a 2 stage titrated process???
At the end of the day there is really no difference. With titration you work out your chemical requirements from the result of the titration. With no-titration you estimate the amount for the 1st reaction (usually from experiance) then from the result of a 10/90 dropout test will calculate the exact amount for the 2nd stage.

Both methods will require less chemicals than using a single stage.

Without trying to confuse you with too much information, it is more important that you do a glycerol pre-treatment than whichever of the two types of reactions you choose.

http://www.biopowered.co.uk/wiki/Glycerol_wash
« Last Edit: April 17, 2015, 07:37:35 PM by dgs »
FOC water tests by Sandy brae or Karl Fischer for forum members.

Offline Jamesrl

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2161
  • Location: Witsend, Cockoo Land
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #6 on: April 17, 2015, 05:42:38 PM »
I'd hate to think of the last time I titrated, I don't reckon it's as accurate as peeps seem to think especially as most of us made up our own solutions.

Titless with glyc wash for me.

Offline Head Womble

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2071
  • I like shiny things
  • Location: Heathrow area
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2015, 08:50:41 PM »
With titration I always struggled to get a complete reaction.
I now do no titration, but as some have said it takes some time to get a true indication of dropout, so now I just give it 10 mins to dropout and add 10 to 20% more NaOH than calculated.

using this method I get a complete reaction every time with no fuss.
Skoda Yeti L&K 2L TDI 150 CR DPF Adblue
VW Touran 1.6tdi DSG.
Both running pimp diesel.

Offline dgs

  • Wiki Editor
  • Grand Gunge Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1308
  • Location: york
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2015, 09:58:52 PM »
With titration I always struggled to get a complete reaction.
I now do no titration, but as some have said it takes some time to get a true indication of dropout, so now I just give it 10 mins to dropout and add 10 to 20% more NaOH than calculated.

using this method I get a complete reaction every time with no fuss.

Indeed, the 10/90 dropout test is full of anamolies
FOC water tests by Sandy brae or Karl Fischer for forum members.

Offline Jamesrl

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2161
  • Location: Witsend, Cockoo Land
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2015, 12:32:32 AM »
With titration I always struggled to get a complete reaction.
I now do no titration, but as some have said it takes some time to get a true indication of dropout, so now I just give it 10 mins to dropout and add 10 to 20% more NaOH than calculated.

using this method I get a complete reaction every time with no fuss.

Same here but 10% extra added to stage 2 sees me to a clear 10/90, I do use ASM though. 

Offline K.H

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 2353
  • Location: Tosser towers
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #10 on: April 18, 2015, 08:13:02 AM »
Two stage non titration with ASM for me, quite often turns out to be a one stage anyway

Offline Bio-boy

  • Impeller jammer
  • ***
  • Posts: 197
  • Location: Wirral
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #11 on: April 19, 2015, 06:00:44 PM »
Really impressed with this process. 130 litres feedstock, 2 stage no titration, 100% conversion and only requiring 3 water washes. Yield 125 Litres!!! WOW. I can't believe its taken me so long to jump ship. 

Offline therecklessengineer

  • Administrator
  • Oil obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 648
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #12 on: April 19, 2015, 08:15:15 PM »
Now try it with ASM.  ;)

Offline SS069

  • Barrel scraper
  • *
  • Posts: 3
  • Location: East Lancashire
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #13 on: May 17, 2019, 04:07:27 PM »
ASM, I know its Anhydrous Sodium Methylate, but how do you use it, do you dilute it with methanol & what are the base amounts on new veg oil - SVO....?

Offline dgs

  • Wiki Editor
  • Grand Gunge Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1308
  • Location: york
Re: No Titration reaction process
« Reply #14 on: May 17, 2019, 06:48:00 PM »
Hi SS069, yes, ASM is good stuff, just dilute it in methanol as you would a solid catalyst. You can deduct the volume of methanol you add in the ASM. The base is really 5.0 but some use down to 3.5 As it is 30% strength you should multiply the weight of the solid catalyst by 3.33 ( most round this up to 3.5)

Disadvantage is that ASM gives rise to solid glycerol, some (like me) use 50/50 KOH/ASM it works nearly as well, works out much cheaper and gives you liquid glyc for pre-treating.
FOC water tests by Sandy brae or Karl Fischer for forum members.