Author Topic: Poor winter fuel economy  (Read 14507 times)

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5110
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: Poor winter fuel economy
« Reply #45 on: May 02, 2015, 06:58:19 PM »
Didn't see that trinity had a 5l one on eBay, bit late for me this time but have you got a link?

Offline nigelb

  • Wiki Editor
  • Grand Gunge Master
  • ******
  • Posts: 1431
  • Location: Leicester
Re: Poor winter fuel economy
« Reply #46 on: May 02, 2015, 11:27:41 PM »
Didn't see that trinity had a 5l one on eBay, bit late for me this time but have you got a link?

http://www.trinity-research.co.uk/product_info.php?cPath=21_25_26&products_id=50

I cant find the ebay advert but just pulled this from the Trinity website

Offline GedsJeep

  • Wiki Editor
  • Oil obsessive
  • *****
  • Posts: 832
  • Location: Scouser
Re: Poor winter fuel economy
« Reply #47 on: June 16, 2015, 11:59:55 PM »
took the rexton down to cosford airshow.

90 miles of 80mph motorway and an hour in traffic idling.

the same back

bit more running round

total miles 280

used 46L. with 20ml in 20L

i think thats about 120 odd miles to a cubbie at 80mph.

in a 2.9L 2.5 tonne truck.

not sure what that is to the gallon?

450,000 miles plus on 100% WVO

Offline Tony

  • Administrator
  • Oil baron
  • *******
  • Posts: 5110
  • Fo' shizzle, biodizzle
    • Southampton Waste Oil Collection
  • Location: Southampton
Re: Poor winter fuel economy
« Reply #48 on: June 17, 2015, 07:58:23 AM »
Google is great for this kind of conversion, so long as you remember to inform it that they are imperial (not US) gallons:

https://www.google.com/webhp?hl=en#hl=en&q=280%2F46+miles+per+litre+in+miles+per+imperial+gallon

Result - 27.7mpg.  Pretty respectable for the vehicle.  Automatic box?

At the moment I'm not seeing any clear gains from using 2-EHN now we're in the peak of summer, so I've stopped adding it.  I think it's great for cold, short journeys, but makes little or no difference (even in winter) to long journeys.

Perhaps this is why people's results are so variable?
« Last Edit: June 17, 2015, 08:00:12 AM by Tony »